Skip to content
Case studies

The cost of not screening.

Inadequate screening costs analyst time, exposes institutions to preventable risk, and creates regulatory vulnerability. Here is what structured computation changes.

Cost of manual screening
Screenings per year30
Analyst days per screening3 days
Cost per analyst day (USD)USD 500
Annual manual screening costUSD 45,000
Time per IACalc screening< 7 min
Analyst time redirected to decisions90 days/yr

Your team focuses on the investment decision, not on data extraction. 90 analyst days per year returned to actual analysis.

Forensic detection

A Malaysian healthcare company’s audited accounts showed significant discrepancies from management representations. The regulatory action that followed exposed investors to material loss.

IACalc’s forensic metrics — Beneish M-Score, Revenue-OCF divergence, accruals ratio — would have flagged the anomaly before the regulatory action.

Beneish M-Score: CriticalRevenue-OCF Divergence: InvestigateAccruals Ratio: InvestigateSloan Accrual: Monitor

No company named. The numbers speak for themselves.

Regulatory alignment

SC Malaysia publishes enforcement actions involving inadequate due diligence and insufficient basis for investment recommendations. IACalc produces a documented, source-traced screening output that gives investment decisions a defensible reasonable basis — aligned with SC Malaysia guidelines and CFA Institute Standard V(A): Diligence and Reasonable Basis.

Don’t let the next enforcement action be yours.

See how IACalc screens a real document with full forensic coverage and source provenance.

Request a Walkthrough